Home Blog Stake.com Faces Legal Battle Over Copyright Allegations Down Under

The team at Betsquare places great importance on maintaining fairness and impartiality. Our reviews and informative pieces are backed by sponsorships, allowing us to provide content at no cost to our audience. Our revenue sources are primarily bifurcated. Our first revenue stream comes from advertisers who pay for featured placement. This funding can influence the prominence of certain advertisers' offerings on our platforms. It's important to note that not every product or service out there is featured on Betsquare. Furthermore, we incorporate hyperlinks to advertiser offerings in select articles. These 'affiliate links' have the potential to generate earnings for our site upon user interaction. However, the payouts we receive do not sway the integrity of our editorial content or suggestions. Consequently, Betsquare neither guarantees nor claims the completeness or dependability of all published information. Listed below are our alliances with products that include affiliate linkage.

Stake.com Faces Legal Battle Over Copyright Allegations Down Under

Last update: May, 2024

Lisa Cheban
Written by: Lisa Cheban Content writer
{2}

Stake.com, a leading Drake-branded online casino , faces a heated legal contest in Australia following a dispute initiated by Stake, a domestic shares trading service. The lawsuit, brought before Australia’s Federal Court, underscores concerns that the brand identity and name of Stake.com might lead to confusion among Stake’s clientele, potentially affecting the share trading company’s reputation.

Stake.com, established back in 2017 with a Curacao license, runs an online casino and is also linked to a sister sweepstakes platform, Stake.us, in the USA. Known for its contemporary flair and innovative inclinations towards cryptocurrency wagering and betting. Earlier this year, in July, the entity hinted at seeking an Australian gaming license.

Reports from the Australian Associated Press denote that Stake, a Sydney-centric stock brokerage, is embroiled in a suit against the casino operator. Their argument lies in the similar naming convention possibly confusing stakeholders. Both enterprises, notably, sprang up in 2017, adding complexity to the court proceedings.

Per Stake’s domain, hellostake.com, their users are privy to investment opportunities across a spectrum of stocks and financial instruments. The platform prides itself on ease of use and user-friendly design, extending its brokerage reach over territories like the UK, Australia, Brazil, and New Zealand.

The legal representatives of the stock brokerage posit that although distinct in their operational domains, the branding overlap might mislead users, fostering unwanted associations between the two entities. The legal papers suggest that Stake.com’s presence in Australia could tarnish the established esteem Stake enjoys within finance circles. online gaming The trading entity raises alarms regarding the casino operator’s network, alleging it is filled with 'inaccurate' data likely to deceive patrons. Emphasized is Stake.com’s online retail section, branding goods under 'Stake' rather than the full 'Stake.com'.

Trademark disputes over similar-sounding names are not new and span numerous sectors. Yet, the verdict of such cases usually hinges on the extent of name resemblance, overlap in service offerings, and the risk of customer mix-ups. The longer-established entity often holds a slight upper hand.

Conceived in 2017 by Ed Craven and Bijan Tehrani, Stake.com rapidly ascended to prominence. While their journey has seen success, they've also navigated through significant legal challenges.

Stake.com weathered a monumental $400 million lawsuit the previous year, instigated by an ousted business partner. The claimant alleged termination without equitable recompense.

Responding to these allegations, Stake.com released a statement terming the lawsuit as a baseless endeavor to tarnish its reputation and force monetary settlement without merit. The company remains steadfast in dismissing such extortive claims and anticipates a favorable judicial outcome.

Are we on the brink of seeing any shifts in Australia's online gambling landscape?

Article written by

Lisa Cheban