On a notable Wednesday in July 2023, the eagerly awaited parliamentary analysis on gambling ads and their repercussions was made public. According to the findings, an overarching embargo on gambling promotions is advised within a 3-year window, spanning all media outlets. Yet, instead of advocating an immediate ban, the suggestions propose a gradual restriction, starting with prohibiting ads an hour before and following live sports broadcasts. Australian online casinos Despite the proposal for a full-scale cessation within three years facing skepticism from television and betting stakeholders, crossbenchers are pressing for a more rapid implementation. The Greens and independent figures propose that gambling promotions should vanish within 12 months. Among those championing this initiative are independent MPs Rebekha Sharkie, Zoe Daniel, and Andrew Wilkie.
Australian Crossbenchers Advocate for the Government to Expedite the Ban on Gambling Advertisements
Last update: May, 2024

Sarah Hanson-Young of the Green Party voiced her concerns over the government's hesitation to swiftly enact these suggestions. Her apprehension follows Labor's commitment merely to contemplate the proposals, with dialogues still unfolding.
She remarked, “The complete prohibition of gambling promotions should align with the timeline of footy finals. Three years is further prolongation for ads that exacerbate addiction, dismantle lives, and negatively influence youth.”
Zoe Daniel resonated with Hanson’s doubts, highlighting that this prolonged period would grant gambling corporations and vested parties ample opportunity to thwart the proposals. He emphasized that this delay might ultimately undermine the government's resolve to act on the committee's advice.
She urged, “Considering the committee has recognized the gravity of this issue, an immediate action from the government is imperative, and a total cessation of gambling ads should occur wherever possible, adhering to the swiftest possible legislative path.”
Reflexive Reactions that Might Detrimentally Impact the Audience
Following the suggested prohibition, anticipation was high for Free TV Australia to vocalize dissent, and it didn’t come up short. Bridget Fair, leading the organization, cautioned against a hasty decision that could potentially compromise viewer satisfaction and the cherished TV services. She warned of possibly halting free sports telecasts if the prohibition materializes.
Fair suggested instead that the government could pursue solutions like frequency limits and a more calibrated response to public unease about gambling ad volumes.
She conveyed, “Any further gambling advertisement restrictions must correspond with easing regulatory pressures on commercial broadcasters. Specifically, abolishing spectrum fees, a move that aligns with policies already adopted by several nations decades ago.”
Kai Cantwell, CEO of Responsible Wagering Australia, echoed Free TV Australia’s disapproval by stating that the advertising ban lacked foresight and effectiveness. Cantwell warned that the ban might steer Australians towards unauthorized offshore platforms, thus diminishing the government's progress.
Interestingly, Sportsbet, a gaming service frontrunner, has already shown support for initiatives like penalizing commissions and enforcing data-inspired interventions. Still, the firm voiced concerns about the ad ban's extremity.
Sportsbet's CEO, Barni Evans, commented, “Recognizing that gambling serves as a legitimate and responsibly enjoyed entertainment for millions of Australians is crucial while considering regulatory modifications.”
New Gaming Regulations to be Introduced in Australia