Home Blog Australian Crossbenchers Advocate for the Government to Expedite the Ban on Gambling Advertisements

The Betsquare editorial team cherishes its autonomy and impartial stance. To maintain our reviews and insights available at no cost to our audience, we receive financial support from advertisers on our site, sourced primarily from two avenues. Firstly, we provide avenues for advertisers to engage in paid placements. The revenue from these placements might influence the visibility of specific offers by advertisers on the site. It’s important to acknowledge that not every service or product out there is featured on Betsquare. Moreover, within some of our articles, we include links to our partners' offers; these 'affiliate links' might generate a commission for our platform when they're pursued. The payments we gather from advertisers hold no sway over our editorial team's suggestions or conclusions presented in our articles, nor do they meddle with Betsquare's informational integrity. It should be noted that we cannot promise the absolute comprehensiveness of all shared details. Consequently, we make no assurances regarding their flawless accuracy or applicability. Below is a roster of our partnership entities that provide the products for which we possess affiliate endorsements.

Australian Crossbenchers Advocate for the Government to Expedite the Ban on Gambling Advertisements

Last update: May, 2024

Andy Potts
Written by: Andy Potts Editor
{2}

On a notable Wednesday in July 2023, the eagerly awaited parliamentary analysis on gambling ads and their repercussions was made public. According to the findings, an overarching embargo on gambling promotions is advised within a 3-year window, spanning all media outlets. Yet, instead of advocating an immediate ban, the suggestions propose a gradual restriction, starting with prohibiting ads an hour before and following live sports broadcasts. Australian online casinos Despite the proposal for a full-scale cessation within three years facing skepticism from television and betting stakeholders, crossbenchers are pressing for a more rapid implementation. The Greens and independent figures propose that gambling promotions should vanish within 12 months. Among those championing this initiative are independent MPs Rebekha Sharkie, Zoe Daniel, and Andrew Wilkie.

Sarah Hanson-Young of the Green Party voiced her concerns over the government's hesitation to swiftly enact these suggestions. Her apprehension follows Labor's commitment merely to contemplate the proposals, with dialogues still unfolding.

She remarked, “The complete prohibition of gambling promotions should align with the timeline of footy finals. Three years is further prolongation for ads that exacerbate addiction, dismantle lives, and negatively influence youth.”

Zoe Daniel resonated with Hanson’s doubts, highlighting that this prolonged period would grant gambling corporations and vested parties ample opportunity to thwart the proposals. He emphasized that this delay might ultimately undermine the government's resolve to act on the committee's advice.

She urged, “Considering the committee has recognized the gravity of this issue, an immediate action from the government is imperative, and a total cessation of gambling ads should occur wherever possible, adhering to the swiftest possible legislative path.”

Reflexive Reactions that Might Detrimentally Impact the Audience

Following the suggested prohibition, anticipation was high for Free TV Australia to vocalize dissent, and it didn’t come up short. Bridget Fair, leading the organization, cautioned against a hasty decision that could potentially compromise viewer satisfaction and the cherished TV services. She warned of possibly halting free sports telecasts if the prohibition materializes.

Fair suggested instead that the government could pursue solutions like frequency limits and a more calibrated response to public unease about gambling ad volumes.

She conveyed, “Any further gambling advertisement restrictions must correspond with easing regulatory pressures on commercial broadcasters. Specifically, abolishing spectrum fees, a move that aligns with policies already adopted by several nations decades ago.”

Kai Cantwell, CEO of Responsible Wagering Australia, echoed Free TV Australia’s disapproval by stating that the advertising ban lacked foresight and effectiveness. Cantwell warned that the ban might steer Australians towards unauthorized offshore platforms, thus diminishing the government's progress.

Interestingly, Sportsbet, a gaming service frontrunner, has already shown support for initiatives like penalizing commissions and enforcing data-inspired interventions. Still, the firm voiced concerns about the ad ban's extremity.

Sportsbet's CEO, Barni Evans, commented, “Recognizing that gambling serves as a legitimate and responsibly enjoyed entertainment for millions of Australians is crucial while considering regulatory modifications.”

New Gaming Regulations to be Introduced in Australia

Article written by

Andy Potts